Will the name hold true after 2013?
Perspective on 2011 Impacts
Here’s a perspective on what our
firm found as a matter of practical experience with clients since these laws
were passed.
What the
application of the 2011 foreclosure laws has shown us is that the cases filed
require more work up front but actually settle sooner in the process. The end
result is that we find that our clients are spending less
money in the long run through the utilization of the expedited foreclosure
process.. In our practice, most
applications for expedited foreclosure went from filing to order or settlement
in less than 6 months. Given that the 2011 foreclosure laws are specific about
aspects like service and default orders, we experienced a reduced incidence of
the delays that are the norm in judicial foreclosure cases. These delays
regularly push judicial foreclosure cases beyond 12 months.
Less than 2% of the applications
we filed went all the way to the final hearing. While we had responses to the
applications filed in an estimated 20% of proceedings, most respondents did so
with the goal of working toward payment arrangements and filed a response, not
to challenge the proceeding but to avoid default.
2013 and Beyond: Will the Process
Continue to Be “Expedited”?
The 2013 changes to the
foreclosure laws made additions affecting service of citation, court-ordered
mediation, and forms promulgated by the Texas Supreme Court. Excepting the
forms, the newest additions to the foreclosure laws may add time to the process
which typically results in an inherent cost increase. Only time will tell
whether the newest legislation affecting foreclosures will positively or
negatively affect a system that has proven efficient and less expensive for
community associations and its members.
Court-Ordered Mediation. One
new addition to the foreclosure laws provides the potential that a court can
order the parties to mediate. The court may only order mediation under certain
circumstances and a hearing is required as a component of ordering mediation.
With a hearing about mediation and an actual mediation being part of the
foreclosure process, it will certainly add time and expense to the expedited
foreclosure process. The parties will share the costs of the mediator and a
court will appoint a mediator if the parties cannot agree on one. While courts
may not order mediation in all proceedings, for those in which they do order
mediation, I expect those proceedings to last longer and cost more.
In conclusion, community
associations that have not yet tested the expedited foreclosure process should
consider the option if permitted by the dedicatory instruments. Given the
efficiency and reduced cost when compared to the traditional judicial
foreclosure process, the expedited approach should work toward improvement in
the rate of collection for the association.
The guest blogger for this post is Brady Ortego, an attorney specializing in HOA law
affiliated with Roberts, Markel in Houston, Texas.


